International Video and WebRTC development agency selling to product leads, CTOs, and technical buyers who can spot generic SEO content from a mile away. Polina Sapunova didn't need volume. She needed content that holds up to a technical evaluation, and an architecture ready for how technical buyers actually search in 2026: half on Google, half on ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. Commercial SEO meets Generative Engine Optimization.
Make my tech SEO actually rank →no retainer trap. just truth.
Forasoft sells to engineers and product leads. Generic content gets laughed off the page, and the search landscape is splitting in two: Google and the LLMs.
WebRTC integration partners are evaluated by CTOs and senior engineers. The bar for credibility on the page is brutally high. One vague paragraph about "scalable video solutions" and you're disqualified. The kind of audience that punishes fluff in real time.
Half of Forasoft's buyers Google. The other half ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude for vendor shortlists. Most B2B SEO programs are built for the first half. The content architecture has to win in both, or you lose half the funnel without knowing why.
No proper Organization schema. Missing sameAs declarations. No Service or Offer entities to anchor commercial pages. Google didn't know what kind of company Forasoft actually was, and LLMs had even less to work with when buyers asked "best WebRTC dev shops."
Webflow site, GA4 partially configured, conversion events firing inconsistently, no clean attribution between organic and demo requests. You can't optimize what you can't measure, so the whole program needed a clean tracking foundation before content investments paid off.
Bottom-funnel content engineered for CTOs, product leads, and senior engineers evaluating WebRTC partners. Comparison pages, use-case pages, implementation guides, integration scenarios, all written at the technical depth the audience actually demands. No "scalable solutions" filler. Real architecture talk.
Content and schema engineered so ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini can confidently name Forasoft when buyers ask "best WebRTC development partners". Entity stacking, sameAs declarations, Q&A-shaped content blocks, citation-ready facts. Half the funnel now lives inside an LLM. We built for it.
Strategy is cheap. Delivery is what we ship. Here’s what actually landed.
Full bottom-funnel SEO strategy tuned to a technical-buyer audience. Use cases, comparison angles, implementation depth, mapped to what CTOs actually evaluate.
JSON-LD schema rebuild (Organization, Service, Offer, Product, FAQPage, BreadcrumbList) with proper sameAs declarations so search engines and LLMs both know who Forasoft actually is.
Clean tracking foundation. GA4 events properly configured, Webflow + GA4 wired correctly, conversion events firing reliably, attribution paths visible end-to-end.
Content architecture engineered for the era where half of B2B buyers ask an LLM before they Google. Q&A-shaped blocks, citation-ready facts, llms.txt, AI-agent-compatible markup.
Commercial-intent pages produced and published directly into the Webflow CMS. Implementation depth that holds up to technical scrutiny, formatted for the audience that actually reads it.
Strategic collaboration with Contntr (Kyle) on this account. Two specialist teams pulling one direction. The opposite of agency-of-record bloat.
Two scoping calls with Polina. Full Webflow + GA4 audit. Schema gap inventory. Competitor SERP + LLM citation analysis. Technical-buyer query landscape mapped.
GA4 reconfigured. Schema rebuilt with proper entity stacking. Webflow event tracking wired. llms.txt published. Foundation that holds before content scales.
Bottom-funnel topic map. Use-case + comparison page priorities. Vertical landers planned. Demo-CTA strategy per template. Sequencing tied to buyer-intent depth.
Joint delivery with Contntr. Content shipped into Webflow against the calendar. Q&A blocks added for LLM citation. Schema attached at publish-time. No "phase 2" stalling.
Monthly performance review across both surfaces. Google rankings and LLM citation visibility. Surface what's working, double down, ship the next batch.
Every one of these is something we run daily, not something we read a tutorial about.
Different industry. Different problem. Same practitioner approach.
That data belongs to Forasoft and Polina. We don’t publish someone else’s GSC dashboards, GA4 numbers, or pipeline contribution without explicit permission. What we can say: the program is active, schema + GA4 foundation is in, content is shipping, and the engagement continues. For specifics, we’ll request permission and walk you through on a call.
It’s the work of making sure ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini can confidently name your company when a buyer asks them for vendor recommendations. That means proper Organization schema, sameAs declarations linking your social and credibility profiles, Q&A-shaped content blocks that LLMs can extract cleanly, an llms.txt file, and content that includes citation-ready facts (numbers, lists, named entities). It’s SEO for the half of the funnel that’s already moved to LLMs — whether your agency has caught up or not.
For Forasoft specifically, Webflow was already the platform and our job was to make SEO work on it — not to argue for a re-platform. Webflow is fine for B2B SaaS SEO when configured properly. The work is to wire in schema correctly, fix the GA4 + Webflow event integration, build clean URL structures, and avoid the Webflow defaults that hurt crawlability. The platform isn’t the bottleneck; bad implementation is.
Forasoft needed both strategic SEO direction and high-quality content execution from people who actually understand WebRTC. The smartest answer was a joint delivery rather than one team trying to do everything. Kyle and Contntr are operators we trust. Two specialist teams, one accountable program, one source of truth for Polina. Zero finger-pointing between vendors.
No — it sits on top of it. The foundation that makes LLMs cite you confidently is the same foundation that makes Google rank you: real entity, clear schema, deep content, authoritative cross-references. GEO work isn’t a separate program. It’s how you do SEO in 2026 when half your buyers are asking an LLM before they Google. If anyone’s selling you GEO as a standalone bolt-on without fixing your SEO foundation first, ask hard questions.
Yes — if you’re selling B2B technology and your buyers are technical, this is exactly the kind of work we run. We’ll start with a free audit covering your GSC, schema coverage, and LLM citation visibility, then tell you honestly what the highest-leverage next move is. No 80-slide opportunity decks. Just the sequenced plan and someone accountable for shipping it.
We’ll run a free audit covering your GSC, schema coverage, and LLM citation visibility, then tell you — honestly — what the highest-leverage next move actually is. Before you commit to anything.
no retainer trap. just truth.
info@themarketingmaniacs.com · themarketingmaniacs.com · SECP A827871 · Texas LLC